Vaezi hails Gov., Expediency Council meeting on FATF bills

TEHRAN, Feb. 24 (MNA) – The Iranian President’s Chief of Staff that the government and Expediency Council have held a long and good meeting over the Palermo and CFT bills mandated by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

Yesterday a good and long meeting was held between the government and the Expediency Council over FATF, Mahmoud Vaezi told Mehr News Agency on Wednesday.

Now that the international situation has changed and there are some countries who are hoping to get into relations and expand ties with Iran, after the lifting of sanctions, he noted.

Palermo and CFT bills mandated by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) are very important, he said adding that because after the lifting of the sanctions, the country should not have a self-sanction so as not to hinder banking relations.

The FATF is a common practice around the world; all countries, except for two or three, in the world, have joined it, therefore such isolation is not a good idea, he added.

Regarding the President's remarks that the country does not provide information to the FATF on ways to circumvent the sanctions, Vaezi said that when an Iranian bank works with a foreign bank, they need to be able to work together within an international framework.

On October 7, 2018, the Majlis (parliament) voted in favor of the CFT. However, the oversight Guardian Council rejected the bill by finding 22 faults with it.

However, the Expediency Council set aside studies to approve the Palermo bill back in October 2019 for it believed Palermo and CFT would help the United States to identify the ways Iran circumvents the sanctions.

The Financial Action Task Force announced in June 2019 that Iran had until October to complete reforms that would bring it into line with global norms or face consequences.

In December 2020, in a response to the President's request, the Leader of the Revolution agreed with an extension of the time for reviewing the FATF bills.

RHM/5155391

News Code 170350

Tags

Your Comment

You are replying to: .
  • 6 + 4 =