Iran rejects claims by certain Arab states on interfering

TEHRAN, Nov. 17 (MNA) – Iran Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nation Gholamali Khoshroo condemned certain Arab states and rejected their claims on interfering in their domestic affairs.

Khoshroo, in response to the claims by eleven Arab states, has sent a letter to United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Wednesday, noting that the states who have raised such claims are the ones who supported Saddam Hussain largely during the Imposed War against Iran.

The full text of his letter to the UN chief follows:

In the Name of God, the most Compassionate, the most Merciful


Upon instructions from my government and with reference to the letter dated 31 October 2016 from the Permanent Mission of the United Arab Emirates to the United Nations to the Secretary General (document A/71/581) and its enclosure, I have the honor to state the following:

1. The signatories of the letter accused Iran baselessly, as usual, of pursuing 'expansionist regional policies” and claimed, equally baselessly, that Iran's Constitution 'calls for export of revolution to other countries'. As to give an example of expansionist policy, let me refer to the incitement and full support of most signatories of the letter to Saddam Hussein's invasion of Iran by all possible military and financial means. In addition, it is absurd and hypocritical for the official of some countries whose fighter jets are bombing innocent civilians in Yemen to accuse Iran of interfering into domestic affairs of other countries.

2. By accusing Iran of sponsoring terrorism without a shred of evidence, the signatories of the letter are imitating in a childish way a baseless accusation against Iran by a power, sidestepping the fact that that accusation stems exclusively from Iran's support for the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. It is also farcical to witness a few regimes who have been exporting a host of extremist, takfiri ideologies for decades and funding and arming terrorists in Iraq and Syria and in many other places, to accuse Iran of sponsoring terrorism.

3. The accusation against the Islamic Republic of Iran of interfering in Yemen, again without a shred of evidence, is as much baseless as other accusations. Some of the signatories of the letter know much better how effectively they have imposed a siege on Yemen and its people, much like the one imposed on Gaza, and how effectively they are bringing devastation to an already impoverished people. It is then farcical that they accuse Iran of supporting 'the Houthis in Yemen financially, strategically and militarily, by training Houthi fighters and sending shipments of weapons and ammunitions into the country.' Isn't it really farcical?

4. Accusing Iran of interfering into Bahrain's domestic affairs is another obvious lie. Suffice-it just to remind the signatories of the report of Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry, set up by the Bahraini Government, known also as Bassiouni report, which reads in part and I quote: 'The evidence presented to the Commission by the Government of Bahrain on the involvement by Iran in the internal affairs of Bahrain does not establish a discernable link between specific incidents that occurred in Bahrain and Iran.' This should be enough to discredit any claim of Iranian intervention in any country.

5. With regard to Iran's military advisory assistance to the Syrian Arab Republic, I would like to recall that this assistance is provided on the basis of the request by the legitimate Government of the Syrian Arab Republic. This request is in full conformity with international law and the right of self-defense as stipulated in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations. It is becoming further clear that if it were not for our support and the support of others, for the legitimate Syrian Government, the bands of criminals, motivated by the Takfiri ideology and organized, armed, funded and logistically supported by some of the signatories of the letter, would have by now planted their black flags everywhere in Syria and in some other parts of the Middle East, including on soil of some of the signatories of the letter.

6. This letter also accuses Iran of politicizing the Mena disaster in September 2015, in which the precious lives of around 500 Iranian pilgrims and many more from other countries perished. We have always hoped that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would at some point adopt a responsible approach to this disaster, sadly they haven't. We note, with concern, that any findings from the local investigation on the tragedy, if any, are yet to be released. Our legitimate request for a thorough, transparent and independent investigation on the causes of this tragedy through a committee in which the representatives of the affected countries could participate has so far fallen on deaf ears. We expect that minimum international standards be followed to enhance the management of the Hajj pilgrimage in a way to avoid repeated deadly accidents and to take effective actions to redress the situation. Could these fair and straightforward requests be really considered as 'politicizing' the case?

7. On the unilateral claim by United Arab Emirates over the Iranian islands of Abu Musa, Lesser Tunb and Greater Tunb, the Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates its consistent and principled position that it does not recognize the existence of any such dispute between Iran and UAE; the three islands have been an inseparable part of Iranian territory and, therefore, any claim to the contrary is categorically rejected. Nonetheless, and to show its utmost respect for the principle of good neighborliness, Iran has always expressed its readiness to talk with the UAE bilaterally with a view to removing any misunderstanding that may exist on the part of the UAE over Abu Musa Island.

8. As to the correct name of the body of water between Iran and the Arabian Peninsula, we remind that the traditional term Persian Gulf has been the correct appellation for this body of water from around 500 years before Christ and will remain so for ever. It is a standardized geographical term, recognized by the international community, including the United Nations, and should not be tinkered with due to political projects and daily wishes of this or that ruler.

9. Last but not least, we have always endeavored towards removal of tension in our region and developing friendly and good-neighborly relationship with our neighbors, including those in the Persian Gulf. We have always reiterated our interest in and called for dialogue with a view to dispelling misunderstandings and restoring friendly relations that our peoples mostly enjoyed throughout history.

I would be grateful if the present letter could be circulated to all States Members of the United Nations as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda item 8.

Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration.

Gholamali Khoshroo

Ambassador, Permanent Representative


News Code 121400


Your Comment

You are replying to: .
  • captcha